What is better, Ayurveda or Allopathy? This is the most common question when treating any disease that comes to everyone’s mind. And it is justified to have doubt and question this context, considering the lives of your loved ones are involved. So, it becomes very obvious and necessary to know the difference between the treatments, their merits, and their demerits.
When one starts to think about the above question, the first point for counter-debate would always be that Allopathic Treatment delivers quick recovery compared to Ayurvedic medicine. However, the fact that Ayurvedic Treatment is slower is actual, but it also counts that it provides permanent relief.
Ayurveda, which happens to be the most cultured and reliable healthcare procedure, was implemented in India by some influential individuals around 5000 years ago. It has proven to be the only treatment alternative for many decades. But today, in modern days, Allopathy, which is a 300-year-old branch of medical research, is majorly dealing with it.
Ayurveda, “Science of the Seers,” was developed years ago. The sages and seers who lived in hilltops, mountains, deep woodland, and isolated areas that ordinary people couldn’t even enter were added. They always thought about humanity’s goodness. They searched for medicinal herbs, seeds, and fruits that could cure each of the diseases faced by the typical person. Without any chemist or researcher to experiment with chemicals, these seers identified such plants with their in-depth information that could permanently cure any disease. Currently, all these herbal medicines are known as Godsends!
Western medicine has extended its wings into science and creativity in recent times. Innovation for any illness recorded in the world. This kind of drug has become a call away for the emergency care needs of any citizen with the infinite contribution of scientists. Different components and chemicals are working on to get the best out of it, then they make the drug. With its strong impact on certain chemicals, the Western type of Treatment is said to have a random effect on the sufferer in no time, relieving them from the pain.
Ayurvedic Treatment’s philosophy is to protect human beings from unnecessary pain and to provide them with an extended and healthy life. It consists of natural ingredients and is based on the consciousness of the straight sense, logical implication, and hearing from souls and saints who are understood. Conversely, Allopathy treats the disorders with certain medicines that produce entirely changed outcomes from those instigated by the ailment itself. It is carried out primarily in three steps: Theory, Testing & Observation, and Conclusion.
In essence, Ayurveda contains fruits, vegetables, spices, and natural herbs that help to cure diseases without having any side effects on the patient.
Now, let us dig more into detail on Ayurveda vs. Allopathy.
Meaning of Allopathy and Ayurveda
The word Allopathy derives from the Greek word állos (other or different) + pathos (sickness or suffering), meaning “other than illness.”
Ayurveda is a Sanskrit term derived from “Ayus,” meaning life, and intelligence or science means “Veda.” Thus, the word Ayurveda means “Knowledge of Life.”
What is included in Treatment be it Ayurveda or Allopathy?
What is included in Treatment, be it Ayurveda or Allopathy?
In allopathic Treatment, physicians rely solely on the disease’s effects and not on the disease’s actual cause. In other words, they do what they should do in the field. With any disease, it appears like a medication and then a pill for each side effect induced. As the drugs are designed only to treat the symptoms and not the underlying cause, Allopathy gives only a partial cure.
On the other hand, Ayurveda advances the philosophy of the ‘Five Major Elements’ (Prithvi, Jal, Agni, Vayu, and Akash). According to this approach, these components should be under ‘defect,’’ tissue’ and ‘defilement.’ The equilibrium between the three elemental forces
(Doshas), Vatt (Air + Space = ‘wind’),
Pitta (Fire + Water = ‘bile’) and
Kapha (Water + Earth = ‘phlegm’) – This is the subject of Ayurveda.
Individualised Treatment versus Non – Individualized Treatment
In Allopathy, during Treatment, no individualization is held in view. When two people have the same condition, they will all be treated with the same medication. No distinctions, as such, are taken into account. The care is individualized according to the person’s body constitution (Vata, Pitta, and Kapha) in Ayurveda and treated as per the requirements.
The emphasis of Ayurveda is not limited to supplying remedies when a problem arises. Ayurveda is about having treatments for good health such that, to begin with, you do not have any issues. The idea that Treatment is more accessible than cure is the foundation of Ayurveda. This compares with allopathic medicine, which emphasizes symptom control and recovery.
This is where Ayurveda is a simple winner because Ayurveda focuses on the root cause that has contributed to the health issue and then proposes effective solutions. Ayurveda offers a systematic approach to Treatment that means that the condition is removed from the source instead of only treating signs, as is the case for Allopathy.
In finding the root of a disease and removing it entirely from the patient, Ayurveda objects. At the same time, Allopathy believes in offering patients instant relief by abolishing the creatures that created the disease, but it is not clear that the disease is healed permanently.
What are the Side Effects of using Allopathic as well as Ayurvedic Treatment?
Allopathy has a chain of side effects of its own. It is one of Allopathy’s big pitfalls. Each prescribed medicine is correlated with many side effects that we must take more medications to treat, and the cycle continues. We blindly conclude that Ayurvedic drugs will do us no harm when it comes to Ayurveda because they are made up of herbs and natural products. If not used properly, as per the body’s reaction to the medicines, Ayurvedic medicines can cause adverse effects. Also, the medications should be used in their purest forms without any adulteration.
Natural science is the foundation of Ayurveda; thus, all Ayurvedic cures are similar to nature. In other words, Ayurvedic medicines use spices, extracts, and natural plants. One of Ayurveda’s benefits over Allopathy is that no side effects resemble allopathic medicine with the herbs and plants it uses. Allopathic medication is made in laboratories, and side effects that can range from moderate to severe are found in any allopathic medicine. This is not the case in Ayurvedic medicine, where all the treatments are naturally made from natural ingredients and do not cause devastating health consequences.
Is Allopathy or Ayurveda more accurate in terms of result and diagnosis?
How reliable the diagnosis is in contrast to allopathic medicine is one of Ayurveda’s benefits over Allopathy. Your doctor will prescribe a wide range of tests for allopathic medicine, and if he cannot identify the cause, he will order more. Before you know it, this will quickly raise prices. To search for imbalances, Ayurveda takes a radically different approach and looks at the Doshas. If the body is out of equilibrium, ailments will happen. Also, please do not ignore that the health condition depends on the imbalance in the body stating it to be a minor problem or a significant problem. Ayurveda helps to diagnose the issue accurately when compared to Allopathy.
What is Affordable with Prices – Ayurveda or Allopathy?
As mentioned above, when considering Allopathy over Ayurveda, one must undergo different tests to know the problem and its causes. And it would be then, after the tests, that the doctor will prescribe medicines. But if those tests are not helpful, then there would be many more tests recommended. This goes on, and your savings go down as well. You will be able to get it when the prices for treating the problem through Allopathy have been raised so much that it would start affecting your bank balance. Ayurvedic Treatment is much more accurate and less expensive when it is compared to Allopathy.
Is Allopathy or Ayurveda more useful when it comes to drug resistance?
Drug resistance can develop through the overuse of allopathic drugs, and this cannot be overlooked when talking about Ayurveda vs. Allopathy. When allopathic medicines are used constantly due to their ‘easy fix’ nature, their usefulness will gradually decrease. Because of how the bacterial strains have grown to withstand the antibiotic made to kill them, the antibiotics used a decade ago are not as valuable and influential today. Ayurveda is more popular because of its nature-based remedies, which use herbs to cure the root problem. You do not have to think about resistance with the help of Ayurvedic therapy. Thus, the decades-old and oldest medicine – Ayurveda- now requires a lot of innovations and research to control this drug resistance.
Zint Throat Soothers₹50.00 – ₹300.00
Zinda Tilismath 15MLProduct on sale₹320.00 – ₹24,000.00
Zinda Tilismath 10MLProduct on sale₹220.00 – ₹899.00
Despite being the latest treatment system, allopathy has been unable to find a permanent cure for a few disorders, such as Jaundice, Piles, and Biliousness. Ayurveda can successfully treat these illnesses.
While Ayurveda works slowly but amazingly from its root and cures disease, this is why, as people become aware of their future alongside their present, it is outshining Allopathic medicine.
The cost of health insurance is constantly growing today and impacting the willingness of families to access health benefits. For economically deprived countries such as India, drug-based drugs are unaffordable and troublesome in Western nations due to various side effects. Medicine should be the last form of therapy rather than the first, starting with the process of natural healing, such as Ayurveda. One of the methods of Ayurvedic treatment, such as Panchakarma, will cure the illness before it occurs.
Choosing one from both of them is one of many available options. But choosing wisely and caringly is what it should. There are times when selecting both are of great help and could show fast and early recovery. Hence, choosing anyone and sticking to it makes no apparent sense. It goes with the saying- go with the hour.
Similarly, when you feel selecting either would be the best choice, go for it. But also, do consider the fact that both Allopathy, as well as Ayurveda we can use them together to get results. For example, 68-94% of people with arthritis use complementary and natural treatments, including Ayurveda. It is also essential to understand Ayurveda and Western medicine as two sides of a coin, and they must come together to work for humanity.
The approach to allopathic and Ayurvedic therapies is vastly different. Ayurveda has developed as a therapeutic method with an understanding of physiology that helps it to preserve and restore wellness with a few side effects and emphasizes health rather than Allopathy, whose analytical understanding of physiology contributes mainly to the suppression of symptoms with many side effects. Similarly, in emergency medicine, medical procedures, and surgery, where the current tradition of Ayurveda cannot compete, there is a significant contribution of Allopathy. Therefore, to benefit from pain, all mechanisms must balance each other.
The very heart of Ayurveda is from specific very foundational ideas, such as Panchabhautic philosophy, the principle of Prakriti that explains the predisposition to and prognosis of the disease and regulates the preference in the production of illness of the Treatment, equilibrium, and imbalance of the three doshas (Vata, Pitta, and Kapha).
Interestingly, Ayurveda builds further on these ideas to design measures to fix the imbalance. Via their different properties, the acts of medicines are defined based inherently on their elemental composition. Hence, there is no particular answer to Ayurveda vs. Allopathy.